I argue that, however, although the internet has helped few find romantic relationships and marriages, the research has overlooked various defects and problems associated with this type of "contact." I will examine a couple of them.
The research findings can be summarized as followings:1.
defines morals as: n : motivation based on ideas of right and wrong You can have professional ethics, but you seldom hear about professional morals.
Ethics tend to be codified into a formal system or set of rules which are explicitly adopted by a group of people. Ethics are thus internally defined and adopted, whilst morals tend to be externally imposed on other people.
If you accuse someone of being unethical, it is equivalent of calling them unprofessional and may well be taken as a significant insult and perceived more personally than if you called them immoral (which of course they may also not like).
defines ethics as: A theory or a system of moral values: “An ethic of service is at war with a craving for gain" The rules or standards governing the conduct of a person or the members of a profession.
A person can be described as immoral, yet there is no word for them not following values.
Women weigh income more than physical characteristics, and men sought physical attractiveness and offered status-related information more than women.3.
The service users preferred similarity on a variety of (mainly demographic) categories (including child preferences, education, and physical features like height, age, race, religion, political views, and smoking).
Beware of transgressing the other person's morals, as this is particularly how they will judge you.
Talking about professional ethics puts you on a high moral platform and encourages the other person to either join you or look up to you.To accomplish the above tasks, the partners need to engage in the meaningful interactions (face-to-face interactions, including both verbal and nonverbal communications), which allow one person to give to and receive from the other.